5 Mistakes to Avoid During ISO 27001 Implementation

⚠️ Introduction

ISO 27001 implementation failures cost Swedish companies time, money, och competitive advantage. Based on real implementations och audit observations, here are the 5 most common—och most damaging—mistakes organizations make, och how to avoid them.

These aren't theoretical pitfalls. These are mistakes we've seen repeatedly cost organizations months of delays, tens of thousands of euros in rework, och failed audits. Learn from others' pain.

❌ Mistake #1: Defining Scope Too Broadly

The Problem

Organizations try to certify everything on day one. "Our scope is the entire company" sounds comprehensive. In reality, it's a recipe for failure. Broad scope means:

• More assets to inventory och classify
• More risks to assess och treat
• More controls to implement och document
• More audit days (higher certification costs)
• Longer implementation timeline (6-12 months vs. 3-4 months)

Real Example

A 50-person Swedish SaaS company initially scoped "all company operations including office facilities, HR systems, development, production, och sales." This meant:

• Physical security for 3 office locations
• HR data protection requirements
• Sales CRM security (low-value but high-effort)
• Development och production (high-value, high-effort)

Result: 8 months to implement, 472 500 SEK total cost, burned-out team.

The Solution

Start with minimal viable scope: Core IT operations directly related to your main service delivery. For SaaS companies:

• Production infrastructure (AWS/Azure environments)
• Development systems directly feeding production
• Core supporting services (authentication, monitoring, backup)

Exclude initially:

• Office facilities (handle separately or exclude)
• HR systems (unless you're a HR tech company)
• Sales/marketing systems (low risk, high dokumentationsbörda)

Expand later: Add scope during surveillance audits once you've achieved initial certification och have operational experience with the ISMS.

Impact: Same company rescoped to "AWS production infrastructure och related development systems." Implementation: 3 months, 294 000 SEK cost, certification achieved on first audit attempt.

❌ Mistake #2: Creating Unreadable Documentation

The Problem

Organizations write policies FOR auditors instead of FOR staff. The result: 200-page policy documents nobody reads, complex procedures disconnected from reality, och "shelf-ware" that exists only for certification.

Warning Signs

• Information Security Policy is 50+ pages
• Policies reference other policies that reference frameworks that reference stochards
• Staff can't explain policies in their own words
• Procedures haven't been updated since certification
• Controls described in documentation don't match actual practice

The Solution

Write for practitioners, not compliance theater:

• Keep policies concise: 2-5 pages maximum per policy
• Use plain language: If junior developers can't understand it, it's too complex
• Document what you DO: Not what you wish you did or think you should do
• Integrate with workflows: Security procedures should fit existing processes, not create parallel compliance tracks
• Use examples: Show what good looks like, don't just mandate it

Example - Bad vs Good:

Reference: See Hack23's public ISMS for examples of concise, practical policies (2-5 pages each).

❌ Mistake #3: Skipping Proper Risk Assessment

The Problem

Organizations treat risk assessment as a checkbox exercise to get to "the real work" of implementing controls. Result: Implementing controls that don't address actual risks, missing critical threats, och wasting resources.

Common Shortcuts (All Wrong)

• "We'll just implement all 93 Annex A controls"—waste of resources on irrelevant controls
• "Let's copy risks from a template"—generic risks, not your risks
• "Risk assessment takes too long"—then you'll implement wrong controls och fail audit
• "We know our risks without formal assessment"—unstated assumptions ≠ risk management

The Solution

Invest 2-3 weeks in proper risk assessment:

1. Asset Inventory (Week 1): What information och systems actually matter?
   • Information assets (customer data, source code, credentials, business plans)
   • System assets (production servers, development environments, CI/CD)
   • Dependencies (cloud providers, SaaS tools, third-party APIs)
2. Threat Identification (Week 2): What realistically threatens those assets?
   • External threats (ransomware, DDoS, data breaches, supply chain attacks)
   • Internal threats (misconfigurations, human error, insider threats)
   • Environmental (AWS outages, data center issues)
3. Riskbehandling (Week 3): Which controls actually reduce your risks?
   • Don't implement controls "because Annex A says so"
   • Implement controls because they treat identified risks
   • Accept some low risks rather than over-controlling everything

Payoff: Proper risk assessment means implementing 50-70 relevant controls instead of forcing all 93. Saves 20-40 hours implementation time och produces defensible Statement of Applicability.

❌ Mistake #4: Weak Executive Support

The Problem

ISO 27001 is treated as an IT project, not a business initiative. When deadlines loom or budgets tighten, ISMS work gets deprioritized. Teams burn out fighting for resources. Implementation stalls.

Warning Signs of Weak Support

• Security manager begging for budget/time
• LIS work done "when there's time" (i.e., never)
• Management skips management review meetings
• No consequences when teams ignore security procedures
• Certification deadline slips repeatedly

The Solution

Frame ISO 27001 as revenue enabler, not IT checkbox:

• Business Case Focus:
  • "Certification unblocks 5 250 SEKK enterprise deal" (not "we should be secure")
  • "Reduces sales cycle 30%" (not "best practices")
  • "Required for public sector RFPs" (not "compliance")
• Executive Sponsorship:
  • CEO or C-level owns certification goal publicly
  • Regular updates to board/management team
  • Protected budget och timeline
  • Consequences for non-participation
• Visible Commitment:
  • Management completes security training first
  • Executives attend key ISMS meetings
  • Security KPIs in company scorecards

Reality Check: Without executive support, ISO 27001 implementation takes 2x longer och costs 1.5x more due to constant resource battles och deprioritization. Get commitment or don't start.

❌ Mistake #5: Treating Certification as Finish Line

The Problem

Organizations celebrate certification, then neglect ISMS maintenance. Result: Degraded controls, failed surveillance audits, och certificate suspension—wasting the entire initial investment.

Post-Certification Neglect Looks Like

• Policies not updated for 18+ months
• Risk assessment not refreshed when systems change
• Security awareness training skipped
• Internal audits rushed or skipped
• Management review becomes rubber-stamp meeting
• New controls implemented without ISMS documentation

The Solution

Plan for ongoing operations from day one:

• Assign Ongoing Responsibilities:
  • LIS Manager (5-10 hours/week): coordination, documentation
  • Control Owners: maintain evidence, report issues
  • Internal Auditor: quarterly checks
• Schedule Recurring Activities:
  • Quarterly: Risk register review, internal audits
  • Semi-Annual: Policy reviews, control effectiveness checks
  • Annual: Management review, security awareness training, surveillance audit
• Automate Evidence Collection:
  • Automated log collection (not manual screenshots)
  • Scheduled vulnerability scans
  • Training completion tracking
  • Access review reports
• Integrate into Business Process:
  • Security review in project planning
  • LIS updates in change management
  • Risk assessment for new initiatives

Time Investment: 2-4 hours/week maintaining ISMS vs. months of remediation for failed surveillance audit.

→ See full implementation guide for post-certification maintenance strategies

✅ Key Takeaways

1. Scope Smart: Start narrow, expoch later
2. Write Practical Policies: For practitioners, not auditors
3. Invest in Risk Assessment: Drives everything else
4. Secure Executive Support: Frame as business enabler
5. Plan for Maintenance: Certification is start, not finish

Avoid these mistakes: Get expert guidance from Hack23. We've made these mistakes so you don't have to.

📚 Related Resources

• Complete ISO 27001 Implementation Guide
• ISO 27001 Certification Costs
• Hack23 Public ISMS - Example of concise, practical policies