Willkommen zum Hack23 Sicherheitsblog — wo wir die bequemen Lügen des Sicherheits-Industrie-Komplexes durch radikale Transparenz entlarven. Denke selbst! Hinterfrage Autorität. Besonders Sicherheits-Autoritäten, die von Ihrer Angst profitieren, während sie dieselben Hintertüren installieren, vor denen sie Sie zu schützen behaupten.
Nichts ist wahr. Alles ist erlaubt. Einschließlich ehrlicher Untersuchung von Sicherheitstheater, Überwachungsstaaten und den Hintertüren in Ihrer „militärischen Verschlüsselung" (genehmigt von denselben Behörden, die PRISM betreiben).
Erkunden Sie 65 Blogbeiträge, die das Marketing-Blabla wegreißen, um zu zeigen, was wirklich zählt—von Automated Convergence durch KI-Agenten bis zur CIA-Triaden-Implementierung, OWASP LLM Top 10 bis EU Cyber Resilience Act, Überwachungsfähigkeiten von Nationalstaaten bis zu politischen OSINT-Intelligence-Operationen, die demokratische Rechenschaftspflicht durch Verhaltensanalyse aufdecken.
Plus Simon Moons 13 Architektur-Chroniken und Hagbard Celines Intelligence Operations & Business Development, die heilige Geometrie im Code, Fünf-Muster-Architekturen, das Gesetz der Fünf, numerologische Wahrheit im Systemdesign und Intelligence-as-a-Service für die Berichterstattung über die schwedische Wahl 2026 offenbaren. Alles durch die discordianische Linse, die alles hinterfragt—besonders die Dinge, von denen „jeder weiß", dass sie wahr sind. FNORD.
Sind Sie paranoid genug? Gut. Sie fangen an, aufzupassen. Die meisten Unternehmen verstecken ihre Sicherheitsrichtlinien, weil Transparenz zeigen würde, wie schlecht ihre Sicherheit tatsächlich ist—Cargo-Cult-Compliance-Rituale und teures Theater, das vorgibt, Schutz zu sein. Wir veröffentlichen unsere auf GitHub. Alle 54 Beiträge und Richtlinien. Jedes Framework. Jede Risikobewertung. Jedes Architekturmuster. Jede Intelligence-Operations-Methodik. Sicherheit durch Transparenz schlägt Sicherheit durch Hoffnung, Gebet und Daumendrücken, dass niemand bemerkt, dass Sie auf Klebeband und Lieferantenversprechen laufen.
🗳️ Schwedische Wahl 2026: Intelligence-as-a-Service
Live-Politikintelligenz für Medienorganisationen — Systematische Überwachung von 349 Abgeordneten, 45 Verhaltensrisikoregeln, Koalitionsvorhersagemodellierung und Echtzeit-Faktenprüfungsinfrastruktur für riksdagsvalet 2026. Denke selbst. Hinterfrage Autorität. Vertraue den Daten.
🗳️ Swedish Election 2026 Intelligence Platform
Comprehensive election intelligence infrastructure for riksdagsvalet 2026. 349 MPs monitored in real-time, coalition formation predictions (4 scenarios), automated fact-checking, and systematic transparency through 45 behavioral risk rules. Current Tidö coalition (176/349 seats) stability analysis with 3-seat margin tracking. Pilot program for 5 Swedish + 10 global media organizations. Democracy deserves systematic accountability, not anecdotal journalism. FNORD.
Explore Election 2026 Platform → Utforska Val 2026-plattformen →📰 Intelligence-as-a-Service for News Organizations
Three targeted blog posts for different media segments: Swedish mainstream media (SVT, DN, SvD - €5K/mo pilot), global news outlets (The Economist, FT, Reuters - €10K/mo Enterprise), and alternative media (Fria Tider, ETC, Arbetaren - €1K/mo discounted). Complete business case with ROI calculations (350% for Reuters), pricing tiers, technical integration, and Swedish election 2026 as live proof-of-concept. Automated monitoring beats access journalism. Predictive analytics beats reactive reporting.
Swedish Media Strategy → Global News Business Case → Alternative Media + Discordian Futures →Election 2026 Timeline: Pilot program applications open now • April 2026: Pilot begins • September 2026: Riksdagsvalet live coverage • Post-election: Coalition formation analysis • Systematic intelligence for democratic accountability. 23 FNORD 5 🍎
Hervorgehobene Beiträge
🤖 Automated Convergence: Selbstheilende Software durch KI-Agenten
Vision wird Realität. Erblicken Sie das Pentagon der kontinuierlichen Verbesserung! Die Task-Agenten von Hack23 erstellen IMMER Issues, die Sicherheit, Qualität, Funktionalität, QA und ISMS-Ausrichtung verbessern. Automatisierte Konvergenz in Richtung Exzellenz durch KI, die durchsetzt, was Menschen vergessen. Intensive ISMS-Querverweise. Richtlinien referenzieren Architektur. Architektur referenziert Richtlinien. Dokumentation entwickelt sich mit dem Fortschritt der Arbeit. Das System heilt sich selbst. FNORD. Haben Sie das Muster verpasst? Jedes Issue = Verbesserung. Jede Verbesserung = ISMS-Ausrichtung. Die Zukunft, die Ihnen versprochen wurde—außer dass sie tatsächlich funktioniert. Sind Sie paranoid genug, um KI zu vertrauen, die Ihre eigenen Richtlinien besser durchsetzt als Sie?
Lesen Vision →🍎 Alles, was Sie über Sicherheit wissen, ist eine Lüge
Eine radikale Untersuchung von Sicherheitstheater, Überwachungsstaaten und ISMS-Transparenz durch die Linse der Illuminatus!-Trilogie-Philosophie. Fähigkeiten von Nationalstaaten, die Hintertüren in Ihre „genehmigte" Kryptographie einbauen, das Panoptikum, das definitiv nicht existiert (außer es existiert), und Chapel-Perilous-Initiation durch unbequeme Wahrheiten. Sind Sie paranoid genug? Wenn das vernünftig klingt, sind Sie bereits zu tief drin. Wenn das paranoid klingt, passen Sie nicht auf. FNORD.
Lesen Manifesto →Informationshortung zerstört Datenintegrität
Wie Informationshortung in E-Mails, persönlichen Laufwerken und eingeschränkten Kanälen die Integrität des organisatorischen Wissens untergräbt. Nichts ist wahr, wenn alles hinter „Need-to-know"-Gateekeeping versteckt ist. Untersucht praktische Herausforderungen und Lösungen zur CIA-Triaden-Implementierung, die Sicherheitstheater ignoriert, während Führungskräfte Informationsfeudalismus mit Unternehmenswissen spielen. Spoiler: Ihre „sicheren" Silos sind nur teure Ignoranz.
Lesen Article →🤖 OWASP LLM Security
Training AI Not to Hallucinate Your Secrets (Spoiler: It Will Anyway). OWASP Top 10 for LLMs through a Discordian lens: prompt injection, model poisoning, and why your AI might be the best social engineer yet—helpful, confident, and utterly unreliable. Question authority. Especially robotic authority that hallucinates with CONFIDENCE while regurgitating your training data to anyone who asks nicely. Your LLM is a chatty psychonaut who memorized the entire internet. Are you paranoid enough about what it remembers?
Lesen Article →🍎 Kern-Manifest & Philosophie
„Nichts ist wahr. Alles ist erlaubt. Denke selbst!" — Hassan-i Sabbah (bevor die Illuminati seine Worte verdrehten)
Willkommen in Chapel Perilous. Sie können nicht mehr ungesehen machen, was Sie gleich lesen werden. Die bequemen Illusionen von „Best Practices" und „genehmigten Standards" lösen sich hier auf wie die Glaubwürdigkeit von Dual_EC_DRBG nach Snowden. Sind Sie paranoid genug, um zu hinterfragen, warum dieselben Organisationen, die PRISM betreiben, Ihnen sagen, welche Verschlüsselung „sicher" ist? Warum die NSA Ihre Krypto-Standards entwirft? Warum „militärische Qualität" bedeutet „vom Militär entworfen"? Das sollten Sie. FNORD. Sehen Sie es jetzt? Es ist überall, sobald Sie wissen, wonach Sie suchen müssen.
Everything You Know About Security Is a Lie
Nation-state capabilities you're not supposed to know about, approved crypto paradox (who approves it?), Chapel Perilous initiation through uncomfortable truths. FNORD. It's in every "secure" standard. Can you see it yet?
Lesen More →The Security-Industrial Complex
How fear became a business model and "best practices" became vendor lock-in. Question everything. Especially vendors selling paranoia while their products ship with CVEs older than your career. Follow the money—it leads to expensive mediocrity.
Lesen More →Question Authority: Crypto Approved By Spies
Dual_EC_DRBG, Crypto AG, and why government approval should make you suspicious, not comfortable. Are you paranoid enough? The NSA designed Dual_EC with a backdoor, got it standardized, everyone used it for 7 years. Then they standardized more algorithms. And you trust them again? Fool me once...
Lesen More →Think For Yourself: Classification
Classification beyond compliance theater—five levels of actually giving a damn. Not everything is critical. Not everything is public. Most classification frameworks: security theater pretending to be decision-making. Ours: evidence-based resource allocation. Know the difference.
Lesen More →⭐ Simon Moons Architekturchroniken: Heilige Geometrie im Code
"The Pentagon as a geometric figure suggests five sides, five elements, five senses... Everything happens in fives." — Simon Moon
System Architect extraordinaire. Numerologist. Philosopher-engineer. Pattern recognition expert. Simon Moon reveals the hidden structures in Hack23's three major products through the Law of Fives and sacred geometry. Architecture that balances cosmic patterns with practical implementation.
🏛️ Citizen Intelligence Agency Chronicles
Core Architecture & Security
🏛️ CIA Architecture: The Five Pentacles
When democracies hide in darkness, transparency becomes revolution. Five container types crystallized from the parliamentary domain itself. Architecture that mirrors political reality—power flows documented in code. The CIA exists in five layers naturally, not by design.
Architekturanalyse lesen →🔐 CIA Security: Defense Through Transparency
The transparency paradox solved: security through mathematical proof, not mystical obscurity. Five defensive layers. OpenSSF Scorecard 7.2/10. Zero critical vulnerabilities across 5 years. Not promises—evidence. When attackers can read every defense, make defenses unbreakable.
Sicherheitsanalyse lesen →🛡️ CIA Future Security: The Pentagon of Tomorrow
The future crystallizes from patterns already present. Post-quantum cryptography before quantum computers threaten. AI-augmented detection before AI attacks dominate. Six security pillars preparing for threats conventional security pretends won't emerge. Pattern recognition becomes defensive reality.
Lesen Future Vision →Operations & Financial Strategy
💰 CIA Financial Strategy: $24.70/Day Democracy
Democracy costs $24.70/day when architecture channels cosmic financial patterns through AWS optimization. Five security services, golden ratio resource allocation, SWOT analysis revealing strategic truth. Cost constraints forcing architectural excellence—every dollar justified. Financial sacred geometry through cloud infrastructure.
Finanzanalyse lesen →🔄 CIA Workflows: Five-Stage CI/CD & State Machines
Five GitHub Actions workflows orchestrating DevSecOps automation. Data processing through five state transitions. Security scanning gates preventing vulnerabilities. Manual processes are technical debt. Continuous integration meets state machine democracy. Automation liberating humans from repetitive tasks.
Workflow-Analyse lesen →🧠 CIA Mindmaps: Conceptual Sacred Geometry
Hierarchical thinking revealing natural organizational patterns: 4 current domains (Political Data, Metrics, Tools, Management) expanding into 5 future dimensions (AI Analytics, Visualization, Integration, Modernization, UX). Seven ML models organizing AI enhancement (5+2 sacred numerology). Mindmaps showing what systems do, architecture diagrams showing how they're built.
Mindmap-Analyse lesen →Intelligence & OSINT
🕵️ CIA OSINT Intelligence: 45 Rules for Watching the Watchers
Hagbard Celine exposes the intelligence framework behind Citizen Intelligence Agency: 45 behavioral risk rules across four operational domains, five analytical frameworks (Temporal, Comparative, Pattern, Predictive, Network), and democratic process abuse analysis. Political surveillance as radical transparency. OSINT methodology inverting the panopticon—citizens watching representatives systematically. Intelligence-as-a-Service for democratic accountability. Are you paranoid enough to want systematic monitoring of 350 politicians claiming to represent you? FNORD.
Intelligence-Analyse lesen →📺 CIA Value Proposition for Swedish Media: Election 2026
Hagbard Celine's business development strategy targeting Swedish mainstream media (SVT, DN, SvD, Aftonbladet, Expressen) for riksdagsvalet 2026 coverage. 349 MPs monitored, 45 risk rules, coalition predictions. Intelligence-as-a-Service pilot program for Swedish newsrooms: €5,000/month (50% discount), 6-month evaluation, election night live dashboard. Systematic data beats anecdotal narratives. Tänk själv, ifrågasätt auktoriteter! Business model: Nordic €46M addressable market, Year 3 €8.5M ARR target. FNORD.
Medienstrategie lesen → Läs på Svenska →📰 CIA Business Case for Global News Outlets
How The Economist, Financial Times, Reuters, Bloomberg, and AP can leverage CIA's 45 behavioral risk rules for systematic political intelligence and data journalism at scale. Swedish election 2026 proof-of-concept. Five analytical frameworks, €120K/year Enterprise tier, 10-organization pilot program. Intelligence-as-a-Service for democracy. Think for yourself. Question authority. Trust the data. Automated monitoring beats access journalism. Predictive analytics beats reactive reporting. €10K/month API beats €252K/year traditional political desk. Join the intelligence revolution. FNORD.
Business Case lesen →🍎 CIA for Alternative Media: Discordian Election 2026 Futures
Full Discordian manifesto targeting Swedish alternative media (Fria Tider, Nya Dagbladet, ETC, Arbetaren) for riksdagsvalet 2026. Chapel Perilous initiation through systematic data. Think for yourself, question authority via algorithmic accountability. FNORD detection in mainstream narratives. Law of Fives (23/5). Futuristic 2026-2030 projections: AI-augmented chaos, sentiment analysis, corruption detection ML. 5 pilot slots: €1,000/month (60% discount), 6 months. Alternative media intelligence revolution. Nothing is true. Everything is permitted. All hail Eris! 23 FNORD 5 🍎
Chapel Perilous betreten →⚖️ CIA Compliance Manager Chronicles
⚖️ Compliance Manager: CIA Triad Meets Sacred Geometry
Security isn't binary—it's capability maturation measured in levels. Three principles × four maturity levels = twelve progression points. Pretending you're at Basic maturity while facing Advanced threats = self-deception ending in breach. Evidence-based progression, not checkbox compliance theater.
Architekturanalyse lesen →🛡️ Compliance Security: STRIDE Through Five Dimensions
Six STRIDE categories compress into five defensive requirements—the universe revealing optimal structure through constraint. Client-side architecture eliminating entire attack classes. Zero server vulnerabilities because zero server. Pattern recognition enabling defensive efficiency over exhaustive categorization.
Sicherheitsanalyse lesen →🔮 Compliance Future: Context-Aware Security & Adaptive Defense
Future architecture transcending static assessment: five architectural changes (Context Framework, ML Enhancement, Integration, Continuous Monitoring). Security recommendations adapting to organizational reality—industry, size, data sensitivity, AI usage, maturity. From annual checkbox compliance to continuous intelligence.
Zukunftsarchitektur lesen →🥋 Black Trigram Chronicles
🥋 Black Trigram Architecture: Five Fighters, Sacred Geometry
Five fighter archetypes discovered, not invented—embedded in the combat domain itself. Cultural authenticity meeting mechanical depth. Zero backend, zero installation, zero platform lock-in. Fighting games historically gatekept—we chose universal access instead.
Spielearchitektur lesen →⚔️ Black Trigram Combat: 70 Vital Points & Physics of Respect
Traditional Korean martial arts map 70 vital points—not mysticism but biomechanics where physics, anatomy, and centuries converge. Five collision systems. Damage calculation through anatomical precision. Technology serving culture, never exploiting it. Respect demands accuracy.
Lesen Combat System →🥽 Black Trigram Future: VR Martial Arts & Immersive Combat
Five-year evolution from 2D fighter to VR martial arts training platform. Year 1: Training Mode. Year 2: Weapon Combat (5×5=25 styles). Year 3: Environmental Interaction. Year 4: ML AI. Year 5: Motion Control VR. Korean martial arts preservation through immersive technology. The Pentagon of Future Combat.
Lesen Future Vision →"The map is not the territory, but a well-made map reveals the hidden patterns of the territory. Architecture is the art of seeing what's already there in the chaos." — Simon Moon
🔍 George Dorns Code-Analyse: Repository-Tiefentauchgänge
"I cloned the repositories. I analyzed the actual code. Here's what's actually there." — George Dorn
Separate Technical Blog Entries: George Dorn analyzed each Hack23 product repository by cloning, examining code structure, counting files, reviewing dependencies, and verifying documentation. Based on real repository inspection, not assumptions.
🏛️ CIA Code Analysis
Repository: Hack23/cia
Stack: Java 17, Spring Boot, PostgreSQL, Vaadin
Metrics: 49 Maven modules, 1,372 Java files, 60+ DB tables
Analysis: Examined Maven POMs, counted source files, reviewed ARCHITECTURE.md (32KB), DATA_MODEL.md (27KB), verified OpenSSF Scorecard 7.2/10
Lesen Full Code Analysis →🥋 Black Trigram Code Analysis
Repository: Hack23/blacktrigram
Stack: TypeScript 5.9, React 19, PixiJS 8, Vite 7
Metrics: 132 TypeScript files, 70 vital points system, 5 fighter archetypes
Analysis: Examined package.json dependencies, explored src/ structure, verified combat system implementation, reviewed AI integrations
Lesen Full Code Analysis →🔐 Compliance Manager Code Analysis
Repository: Hack23/cia-compliance-manager
Stack: TypeScript 5.9, React 19, IndexedDB, Zero Backend
Metrics: 220 TypeScript files, 4 runtime dependencies, 95% attack surface eliminated
Analysis: Verified client-side-only architecture, examined framework mappings (35KB control-mapping.md), confirmed $0/month hosting
Lesen Full Code Analysis →Methodology: Each analysis based on actual cloned repository—not documentation or assumptions. George cloned repos to /tmp/, examined source code, counted files, reviewed package.json/pom.xml, verified documentation, and reported real findings.
Code doesn't lie. Documentation might be outdated. Marketing definitely exaggerates. But git clone + find . -name "*.java" | wc -l = verifiable truth.
💻 George Dorns Entwicklerchroniken: Heilige Geometrie zum Kompilieren Bringen
"Code is reality made computational. If it doesn't work, nothing else matters." — George Dorn
The Reluctant Hero Speaks: While Simon Moon architects cosmic patterns and Hagbard demands revolutionary transparency, someone has to make the code actually work. That someone is George Dorn—developer, panic-driven engineer, Easter egg hider, and reluctant hero who wrestles elegant designs into messy reality.
Developer's Reality Check: George's technical commentaries reveal what building Hack23 products actually looks like—the panic moments, the breakthroughs, the 23rd debugging attempt that finally succeeds, and the hidden synchronicities in commit counts, build times, and retry logic. Think for yourself about what "best practices" really mean when implementing Simon's five-layer architectures in production.
🏛️ CIA Implementation Reality: Java Spring Boot vs. Parliamentary Chaos
The Stack: Java 17, Spring Boot 3.x, PostgreSQL, 60,000+ lines across 23 Maven modules. 2,347 commits over 5 years. 91 tables fighting riksdag API format changes. OpenSSF Scorecard 7.2/10. George's commentary in CIA Architecture blog reveals the panic moments: riksdag API breaking integration tests, production database hitting 50GB, dependency vulnerabilities requiring all-night fixes.
Easter Eggs: Argon2 password hashing with 23 iterations. Session timeout: 23 minutes. Database migration 023 added five core analytical views. Error messages containing FNORD references. Security with subversive wit.
Georges CIA-Implementierungsrealität lesen →
🥋 Black Trigram Combat Code: TypeScript vs. Martial Arts Physics
The Stack: TypeScript 5.9, React 19, PixiJS 8, Vite 7. Pure web stack simulating 70 vital points at 60fps. 23,000+ lines across 150+ modules. 1,247 commits over 2 years. George's commentary reveals collision detection nightmares: hitboxes not registering by 0.01 units, particle effects memory leaks, iOS Safari performance 10× worse than Chrome.
Easter Eggs: Land exactly 23 hits → victory screen shows "FNORD". Konami code unlocks "Hagbard Mode" (chaos combat). Health at 23% → UI pulses urgently. Combat feel through hidden wisdom.
Lesen George's Combat System Implementation →
🔐 Compliance Manager Reality: Client-Side Security Architecture
The Stack: TypeScript 5.3, React 19, IndexedDB. Zero backend = zero server vulnerabilities. 18,000+ lines across 120+ modules. 1,423 commits over 2 years. Assessment engine running entirely in browser. George's implementation wisdom: client-side architecture eliminating 95% of attack surface. No SQL injection (no SQL). No SSRF (no server). No RCE (no execution environment). Defense through architecture simplification.
Easter Eggs: Maturity score at 23% shows golden apple (🍎). Complete all 15 controls → 23-particle confetti. Export on 23rd of month → filename appended "-synchronicity". Compliance automation with hidden wisdom.
Georges clientseitige Implementierung lesen →
Developer's Wisdom: George's commentaries teach what documentation rarely reveals—the gap between elegant architecture and working code. The five stages of development (Denial → Panic → Research → Insight → Completion). The synchronicities appearing in version numbers and commit counts. The Easter eggs hidden for the observant. Code that works AND delights = consciousness expansion through software engineering.
Key Lessons from George:
- Tests save panic. 570+ tests = safety net when refactoring. Tests are documentation that executes.
- Simon's five layers work. Initially skeptical. Separation of concerns enables independent evolution. Cosmic patterns = accidentally good engineering.
- Political/cultural data is chaos incarnate. Domain models must embrace chaos—temporal validity everywhere, audit history on everything, paranoia-level null checks.
- Easter eggs matter. Code can be functional AND delightful. Hidden 23s and 5s throughout. Future developers discovering these = consciousness expansion through code archaeology.
- Documentation is love letter to future-self. Six months later, confused-future-you needs explanations. Write for yourself, not stakeholders.
- Panic is the beginning of every solution. All production issues fixed after 23rd debugging attempt (or so it feels). Persistence beats perfection.
META-DEVELOPMENT: Simon architects patterns. Hagbard demands revolution. George makes it compile, deploy, and survive production chaos—while hiding FNORD in error messages. The troika of vision, philosophy, and implementation. Question authority. Test everything. Trust verification. Hide Easter eggs. All hail Eris!
George Dorn, Developer / Panic-Driven Engineer / Easter Egg Hider
Hack23 AB
"It works! I don't know why, but it works!" — after the 23rd refactoring
💻 FNORD 🖥️
Foundation Policies
Core Security Framework
Information Security Strategy
Our ISMS IS our business model. Six strategic pillars transforming ISMS from overhead to competitive moat through radical transparency, network effects, and first-mover advantage. Published on GitHub because our security actually works.
Lesen Strategy →Information Security Policy
The foundation of radical transparency. Security through obscurity is incompetence with a nicer name.
Lesen More →ISMS Transparency Plan
Security through radical openness. 70% public, 30% redacted. What are your competitors hiding?
Lesen More →Why Our ISMS is Public: Transparency as Competitive Advantage
Sweden's only cybersecurity consultancy with fully public ISMS. 30+ policies on GitHub demonstrating expertise through evidence, not claims. Trust through verification beats vendor promises. Always. Are you paranoid enough to compete on verifiable execution? FNORD.
Lesen Article →ISO 27001 Implementation: Complete Guide for Swedish Companies
3,500+ word comprehensive guide: 90-day implementation roadmap, cost analysis (€25,000-€50,000), SWEDAC certification bodies, and real-world lessons. Everything Swedish SMEs need for ISO 27001 certification. From scoping to certification in 90 days.
Lesen Full Guide →ISO 27001:2022 vs 2013: What Changed?
93 controls (down from 114), 4 themes replacing 14 domains, 10 new controls for cloud security and threat intelligence. Transition deadline: October 2025. Complete comparison for organizations migrating to the new standard.
Lesen Comparison →ISO 27001 Certification Costs: Sweden Market Analysis
Detailed cost breakdown for Swedish SMEs: certification body fees (€8,000-€20,000), consultant rates, internal time investment, and ROI calculation. Know exactly what certification will cost before starting implementation.
Lesen Cost Analysis →5 Mistakes to Avoid During ISO 27001 Implementation
Learn from real failures: over-scoping, documentation complexity, skipping risk assessment, weak executive support, and neglecting post-certification maintenance. Avoid costly mistakes that delay certification and waste resources.
Lesen Common Pitfalls →Access & Response
Access Control
Trust no one (including yourself). Zero trust isn't paranoia—it's mathematics. FNORD.
Lesen More →Incident Response
When (not if) shit hits the fan. Assume breach. Plan survival. Are you paranoid enough to practice your incident response?
Lesen More →Development & Operations
Development Practices
Open Source Policy
Trust through transparency. Code you can actually read. Proprietary security is security through hope.
Lesen More →Secure Development
Code without backdoors (on purpose). Every line is a potential vulnerability. Are you paranoid enough to review your dependencies?
Lesen More →Vulnerability Management
Patch or perish. Known CVEs are inexcusable. Unpatched vulnerabilities are pre-installed backdoors with better PR.
Lesen More →Security Operations
Threat Modeling
Know thy enemy (they already know you). Your threat model should include nation-states—because theirs includes you. FNORD.
Lesen More →Monitoring & Logging
If a tree falls and nobody logs it... you'll never know who cut it down or why. Observability or ignorance—choose wisely.
Lesen More →Infrastructure & Access
Network & Physical Security
Network Security
The perimeter is dead, long live the perimeter. Zero trust networking because trust got us breached. FNORD.
Lesen More →Physical Security
Locks, guards, and clever social engineering. Your $10K firewall defeated by a $5 lockpick. Are you paranoid enough about physical access?
Lesen More →Asset Management
You can't protect what you don't know you have. Shadow IT is real and it's already compromised. Question authority. Especially your asset inventory.
Lesen More →Device & Remote Access
Mobile Device Management
BYOD means Bring Your Own Disaster. Every employee phone is a potential exfiltration device. Nothing is true. Your MDM policy is theater.
Lesen More →Remote Access
VPNs and the death of the office. The perimeter dissolved during COVID. Are you paranoid enough to audit your VPN logs?
Lesen More →Business Continuity & Risk
Backup & Recovery
Backup & Recovery
Restore or regret. A backup you haven't tested is Schrödinger's backup—simultaneously working and useless. FNORD.
Lesen More →Business Continuity
Survive the chaos. When (not if) everything breaks. Are you paranoid enough to have a real BCP?
Lesen More →Disaster Recovery
Plan B when everything burns. Hope is not a strategy. Untested DR is wishful thinking wrapped in documentation.
Lesen More →Risk Management
Risk Assessment
Calculating what you can't prevent. Nothing is true. Everything is permitted. Including honest assessment of your actual risk exposure.
Lesen More →Risk Register
Living document of what keeps you up at night. If your risk register doesn't mention nation-state actors, you're not paranoid enough. Question authority.
Lesen More →Change Management
Move fast without breaking (everything). Every change is a potential vulnerability introduction event. Are you tracking your changes or just praying?
Lesen More →Governance & Compliance
Compliance & Regulatory
Compliance Checklist
Theater vs. reality. Checkbox compliance is security theater's favorite performance. Think for yourself about what compliance actually protects.
Lesen More →Compliance Frameworks: Evidence-Based Implementation
Checkbox compliance is security theater. Real compliance requires evidence. ISO 27001 (93 controls), NIST CSF 2.0, CIS Controls (153 safeguards), GDPR, NIS2, CRA—documented evidence trails demonstrating continuous compliance vs annual audit theater. Not "we do this" (claim). But "here's proof" (evidence).
Lesen More →EU Cyber Resilience Act
Brussels regulates your toaster. The bureaucracy expands to meet the needs of the expanding bureaucracy. Question authority. Especially regulatory authority.
Lesen More →EU CRA Conformity: Mandatory Security by Design
Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 is mandatory cybersecurity for the EU market. €15M penalties, SBOM required, 24-hour vulnerability disclosure, CE marking for software. Five CRA pillars (Secure Design, Vulnerability Management, SBOM Transparency, Security Updates, Monitoring)—all legally mandated. Compliance theater vs real conformity. Are your products ready? Think for yourself, schmuck!
Lesen More →Security Metrics
Measuring what actually matters. Vanity metrics vs. reality. Are you measuring security or measuring compliance theater? FNORD.
Lesen More →Data Management & Classification
Data Classification
Five levels of actually giving a damn. Not everything is critical. Not everything is public. Classification based on reality, not paranoia.
Lesen More →Data Protection
GDPR wants to know your location (ironically). Compliance vs. actual privacy. Question what "protection" really means. FNORD.
Lesen More →Privacy Policy
Surveillance capitalism meets anarchist data protection. GDPR as weapon against the panopticon. Are you paranoid enough about who's tracking you?
Lesen More →Governance & Management
Stakeholder Management
Who cares about your security (and why). Spoiler: Most stakeholders care about compliance theater, not actual security. Question their priorities.
Lesen More →ISMS Strategic Review
Keeping security frameworks relevant. Annual review or cargo cult ritual? Nothing is true. Your ISMS needs constant questioning.
Lesen More →Drittanbieter-Management
Vertrauen Sie Ihren Lieferanten? (LOL). Supply-Chain-Angriffe beginnen mit Lieferanten, denen Sie vertraut haben. Sind Sie paranoid genug, um Ihre Lieferanten zu prüfen?
Mehr lesen →Lieferantensicherheit: Ihre Angriffsfläche umfasst Ihre Lieferanten
SolarWinds, Log4Shell, MOVEit—moderne Verstöße kommen durch die Lieferkette. Fünf Lieferantenrisikodimensionen enthüllt. Ihre Sicherheit ist nur so gut wie Ihr schwächster Lieferant.
Mehr lesen →Richtlinien & Schulung
Nutzungsrichtlinie
Machen Sie keine Dummheiten auf Firmensystemen. Gesunder Menschenverstand als Richtlinie (weil gesunder Menschenverstand nicht üblich ist). Denke selbst—aber nicht im Firmen-WLAN.
Mehr lesen →Sicherheitsbewusstseinsschulung
Menschen beibringen, nicht auf Scheisse zu klicken. Spoiler: Sie klicken trotzdem. Phishing-Training oder Pawlowsche Konditionierung? Hinterfragen Sie die Wirksamkeit jährlicher Videos.
Mehr lesen →Neue Technologien
KI-Richtlinie
Maschinen beibringen, keine Geheimnisse zu halluzinieren (Spoiler: Sie tun es trotzdem). OWASP LLM Top 10, weil KI spektakulär versagt. Sind Sie paranoid genug über Ihre KI?
Mehr lesen →OWASP LLM-Sicherheit
KI trainieren, Ihre Geheimnisse nicht zu halluzinieren. Prompt Injection, Model Poisoning und kreative KI-Versagen. Hinterfrage robotische Autorität. Besonders wenn sie mit SELBSTVERTRAUEN halluziniert. FNORD.
Mehr lesen →Cloud-Sicherheit
Der Computer von jemand anderem. AWS/Azure/GCP mit Ihren Geheimnissen vertrauen. Die Cloud ist nur das Rechenzentrum von jemand anderem. Sind Sie paranoid genug über geteilte Verantwortung?
Mehr lesen →E-Mail-Sicherheit
Ihr CEO braucht keine iTunes-Karten. BEC-Angriffe, Phishing und warum Menschen das schwächste Glied bleiben. Nichts ist wahr in Ihrem Posteingang. Denke selbst, bevor Sie klicken.
Mehr lesen →Über diesen Blog
Alle 44 discordianischen Blogbeiträge wahren den radikalen Stil der Illuminatus!-Trilogie: „Denke selbst, hinterfrage Autorität", FNORD-Erkennung in jedem genehmigten Standard, Chapel-Perilous-Navigation durch unbequeme Sicherheitswahrheiten, Operation Mindfuck gegen Sicherheitstheater und Compliance-Cargo-Kulte, und 23-FNORD-5-Signaturen überall. Nichts ist wahr. Alles ist erlaubt. Einschließlich der unbequemen Wahrheit, dass Ihre „sicheren" Systeme wahrscheinlich von den Leuten entworfen wurden, die sie überwachen wollen—und von den Leuten zertifiziert wurden, die sie bereits überwachen. Die Hintertür ist kein Bug. Es ist ein Feature, das sie „rechtmäßigen Zugang" nennen.
Sind Sie paranoid genug? Wir sind es—systematisch, methodisch, mit Beweisen und Dokumentation. Vollständige Abdeckung der Richtlinien aus ISMS-PUBLIC mit verborgener Weisheit überall. Jeder Beitrag verlinkt direkt zur entsprechenden Richtliniendokumentation in unserem öffentlichen ISMS-Repository und demonstriert radikale Transparenz in Sicherheitsoperationen. Denn wenn Ihre Sicherheit der öffentlichen Prüfung nicht standhält, haben Sie keine Sicherheit—Sie haben Wunschdenken in NDAs und Lieferantenversprechen verpackt, die bei einem Verstoß verdampfen.
All hail Eris! All hail Discordia! 🍎
META-ERLEUCHTUNG: Wenn das paranoid klingt, achten Sie nicht auf Snowden, PRISM, Crypto AG oder die letzten 50 Jahre dokumentierter Überwachungsprogramme. Wenn das vernünftig klingt, sind Sie bereits zu tief in Chapel Perilous. Der einzige Gewinnzug ist Transparenz—weil sie nicht kooptieren können, was bereits öffentlich ist. Sie können keine Hintertür in etwas einbauen, das keine Türen hat. Denke selbst. Hinterfrage alles—besonders das hier.